Wind Farm Affair

Category: Money and deals

Period: from 2014

Outcome: Under investigation (as of 14 Oct 2015)

In 2015, the portal Teleprompter published what it said was a transcript of a wiretapped conversation between Bojan Pajtić and Lidija Udovički. In it, Pajtić said she had complained to him that Vučić's best man Nikola Petrović, director of Elektromreža Srbije, had demanded a two million euro payoff from her for a wind farm. Petrović denies this, and minister Nebojša Stefanović called the portal a “racketeering and bandit organisation”. The investigation never produced a public outcome, and in 2023 a court dismissed Petrović's lawsuit against Lidija Udovički.

The Teleprompter transcript

In late September 2015, the Teleprompter portal, citing a source close to the security services, published the transcript of a phone conversation between Bojan Pajtić, then president of the Provincial Government and of the Democratic Party, and Lidija Udovički, sister of minister Kori Udovički. The conversation had taken place about a year and a half earlier.

Pajtić confirmed that the conversation was authentic and demanded that it be established who was wiretapping him. At a press conference he said, according to a later ruling, that Udovički had complained to him in a letter that Nikola Petrović, director of Elektromreža Srbije, had demanded a two million euro kickback from her. Petrović denies this, and the American company Continental Wind said it had never received a demand for money from him.

The Čibuk wind farm permit

In 2013, the provincial secretariat issued a permit for the Čibuk 1 wind farm near Kovin, valued at €229.1 million, but the ministry challenged it in June 2014, and a new one was issued in July 2014. According to Vreme, EMS had sought to have the first permit challenged.

In March 2014, the company wrote to EMS that its letter to the province “banning” it from issuing the permit had halted the project. Petrović says EMS cannot ban anything and had merely pointed out irregularities.

The government's response

On the same day, police minister Nebojša Stefanović said that the Interior Ministry and the BIA had not wiretapped Pajtić and that the story was „fabricated and made up“, and, according to Radio Free Europe, he called the portal a „racketeering and bandit organisation“. Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić called the affair „fabricated“, said the portal's editor was worse than the editor of „Tabloid“, and accused the American company and a minister's relative of wanting electricity at three times the market price.

Teleprompter editor Danilo Redžepović was questioned by the police, refused a polygraph test and did not reveal his source. According to journalist Vuk Cvijić, he was questioned by Dijana Hrkalović.

An investigation with no outcome

On 12 October 2015, police questioned Petrović, who also took a polygraph test, and on 19 October they questioned Pajtić, who says he handed over documents. According to Vreme, the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade opened an investigation. Lidija Udovički was questioned in Spain and, according to media reports, said she had never met Petrović.

In 2021, Pajtić said he had never received an official account of the outcome from the authorities.

Petrović's lawsuits

After the affair, Petrović sued Pajtić, who was acquitted at first instance in 2018, and Lidija Udovički, from whom he sought one million dinars. According to Mondo, the First Basic Court in Belgrade ruled in his favour in 2019, but according to Insajder, the same court in March 2023 dismissed the lawsuit as unfounded because there was no evidence that she had published the disputed claims. Over a single sentence about the affair, Petrović also sued the Peščanik portal and columnist Vesna Pešić in 2017.

Participants

  • Nikola Petrović: As director of EMS, he denied demanding money from a wind farm investor, then sued Pajtić and Lidija Udovički (commented on the case)
  • Public Enterprise “Elektromreža Srbije”: It allegedly barred the province from issuing a permit for the Čibuk wind farm, which the ministry then challenged (responsible)
  • Nebojša Stefanović: As interior minister, he declared the story made up before any investigation and called the portal that published the transcript a “racketeering and bandit organisation” (responsible)
  • Aleksandar Vučić: He called the affair involving his best man “fabricated” and said the editor of the portal that published the transcript was worse than the editor of “Tabloid” (responsible)
  • Dijana Hrkalović: According to journalist Vuk Cvijić, she questioned the Teleprompter editor on party orders, not police orders (responsible)
  • Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Serbia: Questioned the Teleprompter editor, Petrović and Pajtić, but the outcome of the investigation was never made public (investigation and courts)
  • Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade, Special Department for Combating Corruption: According to Vreme, it opened investigative proceedings in October 2015, but the outcome was never made public (investigation and courts)
  • First Basic Court in Belgrade: In Petrović's lawsuit against Lidija Udovički, it ruled in his favour in 2019, and in 2023 it dismissed the lawsuit as unfounded (investigation and courts)
  • Bojan Pajtić: He confirmed the conversation was authentic and said he had been wiretapped; Petrović brought a criminal suit against him, and he was acquitted at first instance (harmed)
  • Lidija Udovički: Petrović sued her over the claim that he had demanded extortion money from her for a wind farm; in 2023 the court dismissed the lawsuit as unfounded (harmed)
  • Danilo Redžepović: He published the transcript of the conversation; police questioned him, and the interior minister called his portal a “racketeering and bandit organisation” (harmed)
  • Kori Udovički: Asked about the affair in which her sister is mentioned, she said it did not matter who was related to whom and that she had the prime minister's support (commented on the case)

Sources

  • Vreme: What is this, if not fascism: 12 Sep 2018
  • Radio Slobodna Evropa: "The Udovički affair": A message to experts – stay away from politics: 6 Oct 2015
  • Radio Slobodna Evropa: Politicians' 'wiretapping' affairs in Serbia with no known outcome: 4 Jan 2021
  • Vreme: The wiretapping of Bojan Pajtić: 1 Oct 2015
  • RTS: Interior Ministry and BIA: The state did not wiretap Pajtić: 30 Sep 2015
  • N1: The law does not trust the polygraph: 1 Oct 2015
  • Nova.rs: Everything the state has forgiven Nikola Petrović: 25 Sep 2024
  • Nova.rs: Court dismisses lawsuit by Vučić's best man Nikola Petrović against Lidija Udovički: 16 Mar 2023
  • Vreme: And from the best man – a polygraph: 14 Oct 2015
  • N1: Lidija Udovički speaks to N1 for the first time since the wiretapping affair: 6 Oct 2015
  • N1: Kori Udovički: It does not matter who is related to whom: 8 Oct 2015
  • N1: Stefanović: We are investigating the wiretapping, Petrović questioned: 13 Oct 2015
  • Danas: Nikola Petrović seeks 300,000 for being mentioned in connection with the "wind farm" affair: 12 Jul 2017
  • Mondo: Ruling final: Udovički to pay a million dinars over wind farm affair: 19 Feb 2020
  • Insajder: Wind farm case: First Basic Court throws out lawsuit against Lidija Udovički (VIDEO): 16 Mar 2023
  • Istinomer: The wiretapping saga: Vulin's passion and Dijana's stigmata: 28 Jan 2021
  • Danas: Vučić's best man: 4 Oct 2015
  • KRIK: Nikola Petrović: Biography, investigations and latest news: 6 Mar 2023