Vladimir Orlić

He allegedly sought covert surveillance of Radar journalists and stopped the wiretapping of prosecutors in the canopy investigation only after the elections, which the BIA denies. According to prosecutor Surla, after a meeting with him about the Prosecutorial Council elections, prosecutors were told whom to vote for.

Affairs

• Irregularities in the 2026 elections: According to a complaint by lawyer Ninić, as BIA director he forced employees to collect capillary votes for the SNS; the Organised Crime Prosecutor's Office ordered the allegations to be checked
• Attacks on journalists: As BIA director, he allegedly asked a court for secret surveillance of Radar's editor and two of its journalists, on suspicion of espionage
• Collapse of the canopy at Novi Sad railway station: As BIA director, he moved to end the secret surveillance of prosecutors from the Organised Crime Prosecutor's Office, which is leading the financial investigation, only four days after the election
• NoviSpy: spyware on activists' phones: According to a complaint by former BIA officers, unfounded proposals for the covert surveillance of students were allegedly drawn up on his orders or with his knowledge
• Students as “terrorists”: a campaign by the authorities and tabloids
• Pressure on prosecutors and judges, and cases taken away: According to prosecutor Surla, he attended a meeting at the BIA after which chief prosecutors told colleagues whom to vote for in the High Prosecutorial Council election